How Philosophy Helped George Soros Become An Effective Philanthropist

If you are a young person who wants to make a difference in the world the options that exist for doing so often feel overwhelming. How can you know which approach is the best approach to solving critical problems that are impacting people’s lives? Is the best way to solving social issues to work as a lawyer advocating for civil and human rights or as a social worker where you can work with the people who are being impacted by issues like substance abuse and poverty first hand? Like many young people philanthropist George Soros probably found himself dealing with this quandary as a young man in the 1940s and 1950s. He knew firsthand that the world could be a better place as a Jewish person from Hungary who had fled persecution. Soros actually ended up studying at the London School of Economics where he discovered the work of the philosopher Karl Popper. Popper wrote a book that is known as The Open Society and Its Enemies. George Soros read this book as a student at the London School of Economics. The book’s arguments would go on to mold him into the philanthropists and humanitarian that he is today.

Know more: https://www.nytimes.com/topic/person/george-soros

The book was an exploration of how societies that were constructed around the ideals of freedom, democracy and civil liberties could succumb to malignant ideologies that opposed these vital concepts. One of the lessons that George Soros mentions learning from Popper’s book The Open Society and Its Enemies is the notion that communities will “flourish only when” they function on the principles of freedom, openness and the protection of human rights. This concept of the open society put forth by Popper would go on to lay the foundation for Soros’ philanthropic work which has been largely concerned with helping societies to remain or to become more open, equitable places. After earning a historic amount of wealth through his work as an investor George Soros would go on to pour that money into programs that promoted the wellbeing of young people, people struggling with mental illnesses, the well being of persecuted minority groups, independent media and education around the world. Visit projectsyndicate.com to know more about George.

The Open Society Foundations operate in a wide number of geographic locations including places in Africa, Europe, the United States, the Middle East, North Africa, and the Caribbean, in Latin American countries and in Eurasia. With regard to health the Open Society Foundations have focused on helping to fund healthcare initiatives that help to strengthen the factors that facilitate and support access to healthcare such as an awareness of systemic flaws within health care systems and advocacy for patients. The Open Society Foundations support the Health Media Initiative and the Law and Health Initiative, among many others. The Health Media Initiative enables civil society to better advocate for and raise awareness about health issues that disadvantaged groups deal with while the Law and Health initiative helps civil society better advocate for the rights of patients. Learn more on Discover the Networks about George Soros.

End Citizens United not Afraid of big Fights

You got to have a dream to make a dream come true, and the PAC (Political Action Committee) End Citizens United has quite the dream, indeed. This organization’s goal is campaign finance reform, and it wants the influence of big money out of politics, especially where elections are concerned. They say that it takes money to make money. In the case of End Citizens United, the mission is to make money to take it away its unruly power to influence voter turnout. The plan is to use the checks and balances built into government and pass a constitutional amendment that ultimately reverses a Supreme Court decision. As the name suggests, the decision on their radar is the court’s “Citizens United” edict of 2010.

Since the Supreme Court’s decision, there is a tidal wave of questionable funding flowing through politics. End Citizens United sees a need for this to stop. However, to successfully achieve this goal, certain conditions have to be met. And, it looks like they are off to a good start getting these conditions set up and in order. It starts with getting people to come together in some form of consensus. And, it ends with these same people voting in and supporting candidates who are committed to seeing change. For the most part, it is a Democratic Party effort. To be honest, it is also an uphill battle. But, it can be done.

With a supporter list that holds millions of names and a plan of action which includes endorsement for dozens of democratic Senate members and key representatives, the ball is rolling. Even though, it rolls uphill. Fortunately, there is a hope to even the playing field, once the right candidates get elected into the appropriate House seats. Experts predict failure, or at least delayed results, for End Citizens United. On the other hand, this PAC has a victory all its own in the fact that it is a strong and noticeable player in the political arena. What turns many political experts into naysayers of this organization is the fact that it does not work with members of the Republican Party. From ECU’s point of view, voter rights and clean elections are king. Not reaching out to republicans is just tough love and nothing personal.

The battle between big money supporters of candidates is seeing a new champion for democrats in End Citizens United. The support this organization gathers year in and year out makes a big difference on the political field. The most surprising aspect of this particular PAC is its operations. They are all about getting to large amounts of financial support totaling 35 million USD (United States Dollars) from new members and urging these members to actively get involved. This means rallying for the right candidates who wish to see an end to the Citizens United decision. Amazingly, the average contribution from their donors is just 12 USD (United States Dollars). What is even more impressive is that the organization reaches these numbers without fail.

As a matter of fact, End Citizens United does such a good job that their opponents accuse them of skirting the line between activism and fund raising. What these critics do not point out is the tremendous and ongoing public support backing the organization. The whole point of their activism is centered on the present conditions involved in political funding practices. It is delicate, but not impossible, to maneuver ethically between the two. From its beginning to the present, End Citizens United displays model procedures on how to do it.